Bibliotheca Catholicaa library of libraries
Summa Theologiae · Suppl., q. 36, a. 3

Whether a man obtains the degrees of order by the merit of one's life?

Thomas Aquinas, Summa Theologiae, Supplement, question 36, Of the Qualities Required of Those Who Receive This Sacrament, article 3. About 2 min.

Read in the reading room → This article at New Advent

From the Supplement, compiled after Aquinas’s death from his Commentary on the Sentences and transcribed here from the 1917 to 1922 printings. About the Supplement.

Text: Summa Theologiae, Supplement to the Third Part (Supplementum Tertiae Partis), transcribed from Internet Archive scans, translated by the Fathers of the English Dominican Province. The Supplement, compiled after Aquinas’s death from his earlier Commentary on the Sentences, in the same English Dominican translation as the Gutenberg Parts. Transcribed by Bibliotheca Catholica from the OCR of four Internet Archive scans of the pre-1931 printings (Questions 1 to 33 from the 1917 Washbourne and Benziger volume, 34 to 68 from the 1922 volume, 69 to 86 from the 1921 volume, and 87 to 99 from the 1922 Benziger volume), with OCR errors corrected and doubtful passages marked, not rewritten. 99 questions and 446 articles. The two appendices printed after Question 99 are not included. Sources, SHA-256 of each OCR file, and the method are in the source record. Rights: Public domain (US)

The Supplement is not a Project Gutenberg text. It is Bibliotheca Catholica’s transcription of public-domain scans at the Internet Archive; obvious OCR errors were corrected, and passages marked “OCR uncertain” could not be confidently corrected, so check them against the linked scan page.

Objection 1: It would seem that a man obtains the degrees of Order by the mere merit of his life. For, according to Chrysostom,* not every priest is a saint, but every saint is a priest. Now a man becomes a saint by the merit of his life. Consequently he thereby also becomes a priest, and a fortiori has he the other Orders.

Obj. 2: Further, In natural things, men obtain a higher degree from the very fact that they are near God, and have a greater share of His favours, as Dionysius says [Eccl. liter. iv.). Now it is by merit of holiness and knowledge that a man approaches nearer to God and receives more of His favours. Therefore by this alone he is raised to the degree of Orders.

[*Horn, xliii. in the Opus Imperfectiiyn, wrongly ascribed to S. John Chrysostom.]

On the contrary, Holiness once possessed can be lost. But when once a man is ordained he never loses his Order. Therefore Order does not consist in the mere merit of holiness.

I answer that, A cause should be proportionate to its effect. And consequently as in Christ, from Whom grace comes down on all men, there must needs be fulness of grace; so in the ministers of the Church, to whom it belongs, not to give grace, but to give the sacraments of grace, the degree of Order does not result from their having grace, but from their participating in a sacrament of grace.

Reply Obj. 1: Chrysostom is speaking of the priest in reference to the reason for which he is so called, the word sacerdos signifying dispenser of holy things (sacra dans): for in this sense every righteous man, in so far as he assists others by the sacraments, may be called a priest. But he is not speaking according to the actual meaning of the words; for this word sacerdos (priest) is employed to signify one who gives sacred things by dispensing the sacraments.

Reply Obj. 2: Natural things acquire a degree of superiority over others, from the fact that they are able to act on them by virtue of their form; wherefore from the very fact that they have a higher form, they obtain a higher degree. But the ministers of the Church are placed over others, not to confer anything on them by virtue of their own holiness (for this belongs to God alone), but as ministers, and as instruments so to say, of the outpouring from the Head to the members. Hence the comparison fails as regards the dignity of Order, although it applies as to congruity.

_______________________

Also online, linked only: the same translation at New Advent and the Latin text at Corpus Thomisticum. Neither is copied here.

Source: Thomas Aquinas. Summa Theologica, Supplement to the Third Part. Internet Archive scans: Third Part, Fourth Number (QQ. LXXXIV to Suppl. XXXIII), 1917, Third Part (Supplement), QQ. XXXIV to LXVIII, 1922, Third Part (Supplement), QQ. LXIX to LXXXVI, 1921, and Third Part (Supplement), QQ. LXXXVII to XCIX and Appendices, 1922; two curled pages of the 1921 volume are read from another scan of the same printing. Public domain in the USA. Printed in 1917, 1921, and 1922, before 1931. Outside the U.S., check local copyright rules. Transcription, OCR file checksums, and method: source record.